Acknowledgments Introduction Gisele Dionísio da Silva & Maura RadicioniPart 1. Theoretical and conceptual frameworksAgainst coherence: Dialogues across research traditions in Translation Studies 25Álvaro Marín GarcíaThe unsustainable lightness of meaning: Reflections on the material turn in Translation Studies and its intradisciplinary implicationsKaren BennettFundamental concepts in translation and interpreting reconsidered in light of ELF Michaela Albl-Mikasa & Maureen Ehrensberger-DowPart 2. Research methodologiesTriangulating data and methods to map the social context of Canadian literature translated into Hungarian between 1989 and 2014Fruzsina KovácsTracing lives in Turkish: The making of a bibliography of biography Ceyda ElgülEthnographic approaches in Translation Studies as methodological intradisciplinarity Maura RadicioniPart 3. Professional practicesTranslation awards in Brazil: Revisiting the literary/nonliterary debate Gisele Dionísio da SilvaMultimodality and subtitling revision: A tentative analytical framework of subtitling revision interventionsRita MenezesThe use of technology in literary translation: Bringing together the new and the old in Translation StudiesRoy YoudaleAbout the authorsIndexThe ever-shifting terrain of Translation StudiesSince the inception of Translation Studies in the 1970s, its researchers have held regular metareflections. Largely based on the assessment of translation and interpreting as two distinct but related modes of language mediation, each with its own research culture, these intradisciplinary debates have sought to take stock of the state of research within an ever-expanding discipline in search of (institutional) identity and autonomy. Recharting Territories proposes a more widespread and systematic intradisciplinary approach to researching translational phenomena, one which can be applied at various analytical levels – theoretical, conceptual, methodological, pragmatic – and emphasize both similarities and differences between subdisciplines. Such an approach, rather than consolidating a territorial attitude on the part of scholars, aims to raise awareness of the ever-shifting terrain on which Translation Studies stands.Since the inception of Translation Studies in the 1970s, its researchers have held regular metareflections. Largely based on the assessment of translation and interpreting as two distinct but related modes of language mediation, each with its own research culture, these intradisciplinary debates have sought to take stock of the state of research within an ever-expanding discipline in search of (institutional) identity and autonomy. Recharting Territories proposes a more widespread and systematic intradisciplinary approach to researching translational phenomena, one which can be applied at various analytical levels – theoretical, conceptual, methodological, pragmatic – and emphasize both similarities and differences between subdisciplines. Such an approach, rather than consolidating a territorial attitude on the part of scholars, aims to raise awareness of the ever-shifting terrain on which Translation Studies stands.